So it works well in the case of "I want to be able to move this window to the upper half of the screen", "I want to be able to make this window take up the entire screen", etc.
BETTERTOUCHTOOL ORDER RELEVANT MANUAL
Manual window management generally gives you better control and generally less overhead in terms of complexity. Spectacle is manual window management and Amethyst is tiling window management.
.png "bettertouchtool order relevant")
"The fundamental problem with sloppy focus on the Mac is that the menu bar is always associated with the currently focused application if you had sloppy focus, accessing the menu bar for a specific application would be supremely difficult."Ī feature matrix isn't a bad idea (and I opened an issue to track ), but it's kind of hard to compare as they are such different pieces of software. "Sadly, it seems that for the time being there is no good way to do this in OS X." And how should they consider the desktop, which is, finally, just a 'root' window managed by the Finder." With sloppy focus mode enabled, with an application below, you would'nt be able to reach them. For exemple, you use an application like photoshop or word, you'll have different panels floating around the main window. Why ? Because a single application interface is split into lots of different elements. "Mac OS X interface and ergonomy is (as said by apple) not 'compatible' with the focus-follow mouse mode. I've seen this "limitation" mentioned in various online forums, such as the following.
0 kommentar(er)
